Papers with automatic evaluation of

6 papers
RAGthoven: A Configurable Toolkit for RAG-enabled LLM Experimentation (2025.coling-demos)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly altered the landscape of Natural Language Processing (NLP), but their use as a baseline method has not been extensive.
Approach: They propose a tool for automatic evaluation of RAG-based pipelines that provides a simple yet powerful abstraction.
Outcome: The proposed tool provides an automatic evaluation of RAG-based pipelines.
LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) can only handle texts a few thousand tokens long, limiting their applications on longer sequence inputs, such as books, reports, and codebases.
Approach: They propose a bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding that extends context windows and more sophisticated memory mechanisms to improve models' long context capabilities.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms open-source models but struggles on longer contexts.
QUDeval: The Evaluation of Questions Under Discussion Discourse Parsing (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics poorly approximate parser quality, says a new study . questions under discussion is a linguistic framework that views discourse as asking questions and answering them .
Approach: They propose a framework for automatic evaluation of QUD parsing . they use a dataset of fine-grained evaluation of 2,190 QUD questions .
Outcome: The proposed framework shows that satisfying constraints of QUD is still challenging for modern LLMs.
SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluation (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: evaluating the quality of generated text is a difficult problem for large language models.
Approach: They propose a dataset for multilingual, multifaceted summarization evaluation.
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be used to train multilingual summarization systems . it shows that the dataset performs well on the out-of-domain meta-evaluation benchmarks TRUE and mFACE .
Towards Automatic Evaluation of Dialog Systems: A Model-Free Off-Policy Evaluation Approach (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for evaluation of dialog systems are expensive and not scalable . a framework for estimating human evaluation scores is proposed to bridge this gap .
Approach: They propose a framework for estimating human evaluation scores based on off-policy evaluation . they use language quality metrics for single-turn response generation given a fixed context .
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluation scores.
Evaluating Factuality in Cross-lingual Summarization (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics for monolingual summarization require translation to evaluate the factuality of cross-lingual summmarization.
Approach: They propose to analyze cross-lingual factuality by collecting annotations and generated summaries from models at summary level and sentence level.
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that over 50% of generated summaries contain factual errors with different characteristics from monolingual summarization.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations